<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Eastwood/Airline Map Bass: Basses That Should Have Been, Part 1</title>
	<link>http://www.hollowbodybass.com/basses-that-should-have-been/new-eastwoodairline-map-bass-basses-that-should-have-been-part-1.htm</link>
	<description>Online Community for Hollowbody, Semi-Hollow and Chambered Basses</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mat W</title>
		<link>http://www.hollowbodybass.com/basses-that-should-have-been/new-eastwoodairline-map-bass-basses-that-should-have-been-part-1.htm#comment-109</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hollowbodybass.com/basses-that-should-have-been/new-eastwoodairline-map-bass-basses-that-should-have-been-part-1.htm#comment-109</guid>
					<description>That Map bass looks great. Mike's stuff is so wonderful, and that one wasn't on the main site yet. Just one more Eastwood to druel over.

About that Classic, I don't think it's actually black. On my screen it looks a very dark red/brown colour which I assume would be the Walnut. It would look great in black though.. maybe with a gold hardware option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Map bass looks great. Mike&#8217;s stuff is so wonderful, and that one wasn&#8217;t on the main site yet. Just one more Eastwood to druel over.</p>
<p>About that Classic, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s actually black. On my screen it looks a very dark red/brown colour which I assume would be the Walnut. It would look great in black though.. maybe with a gold hardware option.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
